BOC votes 4-1 to allow dense residential development around shortened golf course
A retirement golfing village can now be constructed in Madison County.
Sunrise senior village approved
County commissioners voted 4-1 Monday — with Bruce Scogin providing the lone “no” vote — to approve John Byram’s request for a rezoning for Sunrise Golf Village, a proposed densely clustered 55-and-over development around Byram’s Sunrise Golf Course, the only golf course in Madison County.
The plans include 158 single-family homes and 60 townhouses placed close together, predominantly on the south side of Byram’s 135-acre tract. The existing par 72 course will also be transformed into a 2,605-yard, par 57 “executive” setup, with 15 par 3’s and three par 4’s, and holes ranging from 92 to 343 yards from the back tees. Seventy-five new homes will front the golf course.
Byram’s representative, Tom Breedlove of Williams and Associates, said planning and permitting for the development could be completed within the next nine months, with the golf village potentially completed in the next two years.
The Sunrise proposal has been a divisive matter in Madison County for over a year, with repeated pleas of support made from citizens who don’t want to see golf die in Madison County, and equally passionate opposition that said the county isn’t adequately prepared for such a dense development, which will be roughly the equivalent of adding a city comparable in size to Colbert.
The Sunrise proposal has gone before commissioners three times in 13 months, with the board voting 5-0 against the proposal in December 2007, then opposing the development 3-2 in February. Byram’s most recent proposal included no changes from his previous requests.
Seven citizens, not including Byram’s representative, took the podium to support the request Monday and seven stood up to speak against it.
Proponents of the plan said the golf course is an asset to the community, that local high schools make frequent use of the course, that the age restrictions will mean the new development will have no impact on the school system, that Byram could close the course, split up the property and put mobile homes on the land, thereby devaluing neighboring properties.
Former Madison County School Superintendent Keith Cowne, who owns a home in Kingston Greens next to the course, spoke in favor of the proposal, saying it will prove beneficial in the long run to Madison County.
“It seems in today’s times, when we need a digest to support the necessities of the community, we wouldn’t want to lose one of the few economic engines we have in the county,” said Cowne.
Marion Cartwright of the Harrison Community in northern Madison County said the development will provide a needed option for elderly residents in northeast Georgia.
“Those homes put people close together,” said Cartwright. “They look out for each other.”
Opponents of the plan said the development isn’t in line with the county’s comprehensive plan for growth, that the proposed septic system could malfunction and prove a health hazard, that traffic will become even worse on the already dangerous Colbert Danielsville Road, that there isn’t adequate infrastructure to handle the development, that the development will deplete limited water supplies, that the 55-and-over restriction can’t be adequately enforced, that the Colbert volunteer fire department isn’t equipped with a ladder truck to respond to fires in proposed three-story structures, that EMS services will be strained, that there aren’t senior citizen amenities, such as nearby medical facilities and that there is no real demand for a senior development in the county.
Charles Hart urged the board to stand by its previous rejections of the plans, asking them not to be bullied or misled into approval.
“This won’t be a development you can look back on in 20 years and be proud of,” said Hart.
Benjamin Gossett said the plan is not in line with what is already in Colbert.
“It’s been mentioned that this will generate revenue,” said Gossett, noting potential strains on roads and fire services. “My question is ‘when?’”
District 5 Commissioner Scogin made a motion for denial, but the board sat silent, and his proposal died for lack of a second. Scogin noted that a conservation subdivision has already been approved across the road from Sunrise Golf Course.
“I don’t think retired people would mind walking across the road to play golf,” said Scogin of the proposed development in the fifth district.
Scogin noted potential strains on fire services, traffic and infrastructure.
“I do not feel this is the best we could get for this area,” said Scogin. It’s not compatible with the growth we have at this time.”
Commissioner Stanley Thomas spoke in favor of the plans, saying growth will come to Madison County “whether we’re ready or not.” He noted that shutting down the course will result in the loss of jobs. Thomas said the development is a needed revenue source and that the age restrictions will keep school service costs down.
“If you’re 55 and older and still having children, that’s not the norm,” he said.
Thomas said senior citizens are the most civic-minded people in the county, adding that law enforcement “won’t be busting up too many meth labs” in a 55-and-older community.
“They’ll be active in our clubs,” said Thomas of the senior citizens. “They’ll help our mentor program. They may be coaching a little league team. Because if you notice the clubs you’re in, whether it’s Rotary, or the volunteer fire departments, look at the average age. It’s not those 19-and-20-year old people carrying it. It’s those older people getting involved and being concerned.”
The plans include 158 single-family homes and 60 townhouses placed close together, predominantly on the south side of Byram’s 135-acre tract. The existing par 72 course will also be transformed into a 2,605-yard, par 57 “executive” setup, with 15 par 3’s and three par 4’s, and holes ranging from 92 to 343 yards from the back tees. Seventy-five new homes will front the golf course.
Byram’s representative, Tom Breedlove of Williams and Associates, said planning and permitting for the development could be completed within the next nine months, with the golf village potentially completed in the next two years.
The Sunrise proposal has been a divisive matter in Madison County for over a year, with repeated pleas of support made from citizens who don’t want to see golf die in Madison County, and equally passionate opposition that said the county isn’t adequately prepared for such a dense development, which will be roughly the equivalent of adding a city comparable in size to Colbert.
The Sunrise proposal has gone before commissioners three times in 13 months, with the board voting 5-0 against the proposal in December 2007, then opposing the development 3-2 in February. Byram’s most recent proposal included no changes from his previous requests.
Seven citizens, not including Byram’s representative, took the podium to support the request Monday and seven stood up to speak against it.
Proponents of the plan said the golf course is an asset to the community, that local high schools make frequent use of the course, that the age restrictions will mean the new development will have no impact on the school system, that Byram could close the course, split up the property and put mobile homes on the land, thereby devaluing neighboring properties.
Former Madison County School Superintendent Keith Cowne, who owns a home in Kingston Greens next to the course, spoke in favor of the proposal, saying it will prove beneficial in the long run to Madison County.
“It seems in today’s times, when we need a digest to support the necessities of the community, we wouldn’t want to lose one of the few economic engines we have in the county,” said Cowne.
Marion Cartwright of the Harrison Community in northern Madison County said the development will provide a needed option for elderly residents in northeast Georgia.
“Those homes put people close together,” said Cartwright. “They look out for each other.”
Opponents of the plan said the development isn’t in line with the county’s comprehensive plan for growth, that the proposed septic system could malfunction and prove a health hazard, that traffic will become even worse on the already dangerous Colbert Danielsville Road, that there isn’t adequate infrastructure to handle the development, that the development will deplete limited water supplies, that the 55-and-over restriction can’t be adequately enforced, that the Colbert volunteer fire department isn’t equipped with a ladder truck to respond to fires in proposed three-story structures, that EMS services will be strained, that there aren’t senior citizen amenities, such as nearby medical facilities and that there is no real demand for a senior development in the county.
Charles Hart urged the board to stand by its previous rejections of the plans, asking them not to be bullied or misled into approval.
“This won’t be a development you can look back on in 20 years and be proud of,” said Hart.
Benjamin Gossett said the plan is not in line with what is already in Colbert.
“It’s been mentioned that this will generate revenue,” said Gossett, noting potential strains on roads and fire services. “My question is ‘when?’”
District 5 Commissioner Scogin made a motion for denial, but the board sat silent, and his proposal died for lack of a second. Scogin noted that a conservation subdivision has already been approved across the road from Sunrise Golf Course.
“I don’t think retired people would mind walking across the road to play golf,” said Scogin of the proposed development in the fifth district.
Scogin noted potential strains on fire services, traffic and infrastructure.
“I do not feel this is the best we could get for this area,” said Scogin. It’s not compatible with the growth we have at this time.”
Commissioner Stanley Thomas spoke in favor of the plans, saying growth will come to Madison County “whether we’re ready or not.” He noted that shutting down the course will result in the loss of jobs. Thomas said the development is a needed revenue source and that the age restrictions will keep school service costs down.
“If you’re 55 and older and still having children, that’s not the norm,” he said.
Thomas said senior citizens are the most civic-minded people in the county, adding that law enforcement “won’t be busting up too many meth labs” in a 55-and-older community.
“They’ll be active in our clubs,” said Thomas of the senior citizens. “They’ll help our mentor program. They may be coaching a little league team. Because if you notice the clubs you’re in, whether it’s Rotary, or the volunteer fire departments, look at the average age. It’s not those 19-and-20-year old people carrying it. It’s those older people getting involved and being concerned.”
Related entries by tags:
- Commerce man charged in string of church wiring thefts
- Library renovations ahead of schedule
- County digest takes a dive
- Heaven Bound hopes to build in Hull
- BOC talks T-SPLOST
- Comer council responds to vandalism at Arnold Park
- Fine Finish to move
- Colbert council discusses developing website
- Library expansion groundbreaking ahead
- E-SPLOST vote set for Tuesday


So, since the BOC approved this, I expect as a MC voter/taxpayer, that the BOC will closely follow this project every step of the way. Covenants might be a start to enforcing restrictions. The BOC should be vigilant in holding Mr. Byrams feet to the fire, as MC citizens are vigilant in holding the BOC accountable. Put it on your follow up list commissioners. Don't have one, create one. While you're at it please make note TODAY that you will need to allow for additional emergency services and infrastructure to FUTURE BUDGETS!
Presumably meth labs won't be an issue, although criminals do come from all walks of life -police blotter-, deputies respond to EMS, fire and their own calls too so presumably one Colbert deputy won't cut it. You might also consider rehiring the building inspector the BOC recently fired due to no budget funds. We might need him. Plan for these things from now because I don't want you coming back to me (taxpayer) later expecting me to foot the bill. In the mean time maybe the BOC and Marvin White, Chamber of Commerce, can find commercial entities to help w/ tax relief. Dogsboro/Hull area has a lot of vacant commercial space Mr. Youngblood.
I only hope somewhere in this proposal it is stipulated that each unit must be owner occupied. If not, these units can just be bought up by persons over 55 and rented to anyone.
And who the hell retires to Colbert anyway?
We have started down the same path as Clarke Co. and look at the mess it is in. The executive course will fail, I know I will never play there again, and this over crowded developement will turn into a slum that our kids will have to deal with.
Thank you Mr.Scogin for trying to preserve our way of life. Mr Byram is nothing more than a conman. Thank you for not buying his snake oil.
I only hope somewhere in this proposal it is stipulated that each unit must be owner occupied. If not, these units can just be bought up by persons over 55 and rented to anyone.
And who the hell retires to Colbert anyway?
We have started down the same path as Clarke Co. and look at the mess it is in. The executive course will fail, I know I will never play there again, and this over crowded developement will turn into a slum that our kids will have to deal with.
Thank you Mr.Scogin for trying to preserve our way of life. Thank you for not buying his snake oil.
Is this man and the other 4 who voted for this sprawl blind or dumb or both? Look around. Contrary to the fantasy of Stanley Thomas, there is no growth and experts say the era of the subdivision is effectively over due to unsustainability. Seems the BOC, especially Thomas who just happens to be a Realtor(!) just want to shut their eyes and pretend / believe it's still 1998. Curious what bank will finance this project so it can be completed "within 2 years." Will the BOC hold him to this timetable? 200 homes in 2 years? NOW?
Also curious who is going to loan money to Byram who himself said in previous testimony before the board he is "broke" and admittedly mismanaged and made a terrible mistake in buying the golf course. How is building 200 houses going to improve his self-described poor, mistake-prone course / business / financial management skills? Why would any lender give him the money if he has "gone broke" so far? Why would anyone have faith in the quality of construction from someone who has "gone broke?" Why do the commissioners believe that somehow people are going to magically materialize to buy these 200 houses from this financially broken man, when no one is buying the other few thousand houses that have been on the market for years and are being foreclosed upon? And finally, what did Byram do / say / provide that caused the commissioners to change their previous denials to sudden support, even though in that time, the economy and housing market has gotten exponentially worse? And the economy has gotten even worse in Madison County than the rest of the state or nation with the county's largest employer completely shutting down just a few months ago. Was it something Byram said? Was it something Byram did? Was it some additional information or changes he provided? Do Byram and the BOC have some special insight into the housing market that runs opposite to the vast majority of experts who say this is not a dip in the market, but a fundamental shift away from developments located away from regional centers (Athens in this case)? Just a few questions for some real journalistic follow-up.
On the flip side, the question remains as to who will maintain the sewerage system required for this development. Is the county ready to pick up the tab for the drainfield maintenance when the developer is out of the picture? Perhaps now is the time to be having a serious discussion about treatment faciilities in addition to water mians.
Mr.Sartain only lost by 10 votes!!!!
I guess more of you people should have showed up and voted!!!
This is what happens when we only have a 24% turn out!!!
Good lord, it's not like the golf course is in Pocataligo or Paoli or halfway to Elberton. It is at Colbert, and not terribly far from Hwy 72!
Some businessperson with gumption should step up and start planning for businesses that he or she could locate in Colbert to take advantage of this new development. Instead of complaining every opportunity for growth and putting your back against it, why can't you people look for the possibilities?
I swear, this is the same good old "Madison County Loser Mentality" that makes it so frustrating to love Madison County. If your kids' sports team is losing it's the referee's fault. If someone wants to build a subdivision wah wah we wanted cows.
Good luck to the developer. Maybe he can make a dollar there despite you people. Here's a thought... put in a drugstore in Colbert - they will need denture glue. Let them pay the SPLOST that you need in order to pay for the schools that you people complain about having to build.
If Byram had been up front from the get go when he purchased the course and made his intentions clear, he would have made more friends than enemies. By being or appearing to be dishonest and definitely being less than forthright, he basically crapped all over how the zoning process is to work. This dishonesty is unacceptable and should not have been rewarded. I think as many people were opposed to the BOC making a huge "bailout" style exception for a most un-forthright developer as were / are opposed to the development. Will the rest of us get this same preferential treatment? Don't think so, nor should we. It's wrong.
Oddly enough, by being a terrible neighbor, he ensured the failure of the golf course as many people have now vowed to never do business with Byram, be it golf or real estate, ever again.
He said he would have these 200 houses constructed in 2 years and that no one under 55 will ever be allowed to own property there. We expect the BOC to hold him to hold him to this. I for one am curious why people are going to flock to purchase these 200 homes around a sloppy, overgrown golf course when no homes are selling in this county at all and foreclosures are at an all time high.
You pulled off your shell game with the BOC, Mr. Byram. Now go borrow the 20-30 million to get this project completed (in 2 years, just like you said). We are all eager to see these homes selling like hotcakes so we can learn from you what no one else in the United States has been able to do - sell homes in the worst decline in the housing market in U.S. history. Get to work.