Owner John Byram said he doesn’t know when he’ll close the Colbert course and transform it into an executive-level course, freeing up room for a 55-and-older active adult community to be developed around it.
“Indefinitely, because until the economy is strong enough to develop this active adult community, I don’t want to do it,” Byram said.
The Madison County Board of Commissioners approved this much-talked-about rezoning, 4-1, last Monday.
The plans call for the course to be shortened to 15 par-3’s and three-par-4’s with the construction of 158 single-family houses and 60 townhouses.
Though Byram’s representative Tom Breedlove said the project could be completed within two years once started, the jumping off point is uncertain.
Byram said banks’ willingness to loan money will dictate the timetable.
“The banks aren’t even loaning money for that kind of thing right now,” Byram said.
That leaves Byram, owner of the financially-troubled course since 2002, to mull his options.
“I may partner-up with somebody, so I’m sort of somewhat in wait-and-see,” Byram said.
Redesigning the course and laying the infrastructure for the retirement community will cost between $3-4 million — a tentative figure — according to Byram.
The course redesign plans call for changing four greens, leaving 14 unaltered.
“That’s the big expense in building a golf course are the greens,” he said. “We’re utilizing a lot of the existing course without having to change that many holes.”
Byram had tried three times, unsuccessfully, to rezone the golf course property before the BOC OK’d his plans last week.
“I’m just grateful,” he said. “I’m very, very grateful. I really believe the project will put Madison County on the map. It’s something that will help Madison County grow in a positive direction.”
But a number of Madison County residents disagreed, saying the development will be a clear negative for the community. Opponents spoke of traffic safety issues, potential sewage problems, the density of the proposed residential development, the strains on EMS and fire services, the impact on the area’s water supply.
“This won’t be a development you can look back on in 20 years and be proud of,” Charles Hart told commissioners last week.
Meanwhile, others said the rezoning was necessary to keep the course open. They said the development will help save jobs, that it won’t have much impact on county services and that it will provide an option for seniors looking for retirement property.
Byram said he wants to target a regional senior market. He pointed out that Georgia Club — located on Hwy. 316 — lures retirees that can spend $500,00 for a home. But the aim of the Sunrise project is to target those wanting to spend $200,000 to $250,000, Byram said.
“It’s keeping the golf course and yet, giving something to the community and to the general public that’s need in the Athens area,” he said.
With the rezoning, Byram believes he has “saleable product” now. He said there are a lot of courses out there, “but there’s not a lot of golf courses with this kind of plan in place,” he said.
“In my estimation, this is definitely the highest and best use of that golf course,” Byram said.
But Byram said it’s too soon to submit plans for engineering.
“Basically you have to wait until you get ready to construct it … I don’t where all this money is going that the federal government keeps throwing at these banks, why these banks aren’t loosening up their credit, but they’re not,” he said.
Until then, he’ll continue to operate the golf course in its traditional format, even though there’s always the possibility that, if things worsened enough, he’d have to close the course and wait out the economic downturn.
“That’s always a possibility, sure,” he said. “If it got to the point where I wasn’t getting any play at all, yeah. But I hope that never happens.”
Still, by keeping it open, Byram said he’s running Sunrise at a loss.
“I want to keep it running until I can either built it (the development) … or get a partner or possibly sell it,” he said.
Byram talks about changes
Byram said that Sunrise is designed in such a way that it would minimize the changes in the conversion to the executive-level format — whenever that happens.
“Pretty much of the whole left side of the course is going to be the same,” he said. “The part that borders Kingston Greens is really not going to be changed at all hardly.”
The majority of the redesign will impact the eastern portion of the course, he said.
The entire project would be completed in two or three phases, Byram said.
The first phase would include the course redesign, building at least a third of the homes and constructing amenities like a clubhouse, tennis courts and a pool.
Residents’ homeowner association fees would go toward the maintaining the clubhouse, pool and tennis courts.
Golf memberships for homeowners would be offered separately since the course would still be open to general public.
Byram said maintaining a par-3 set-up would be cheaper than a traditional course due to reduced costs with the up-keep of fairways.
He also expects more jobs to be created. Front yards would need maintenance under the homeowners’ agreement, while the clubhouse, tennis courts and pool would need employees, too, he said.
He will build the homes and won't be able to sell them. He'll then go whinning back to the commissioners and they will lift the restrictions on the property. The homes will then be bought by anyone and anybody. In 20yrs we are going to have just a big slum on our hands.
Byram, how about leaving us alone and put Oglethorpe on the map, that is where you live after all.
I know, this is a new concept in Madison County but welcome to the late 20th century.
Know what you are talking about before you start spouting off at the mouth!
I simply called you a moron because I figured if I took the time to expain the comedic device I had used that you didn't understand, it would be a waste of space. You obviously do not have cognitive skills for that level of thinking - simple humor.
That, my less intelligent friend, is the sarcastically sneering truth. Enjoy living in your backwards place safely secure in your 1972 thought patterns and join us in the 21st century someday.
NOW, he says he still might close it, partner, sell and he'll wait for the economy to get better. Why the urgency then? If he sells before he starts the project will the new owner be able to do what he wants under the rezone? Will he be bound to the current agreement or have to submit his own plans for approval? Mr. Byram's recent statements bring his intent into question. Isn't this exactly what citizens were concerned about? Maybe Mr. Hart can clarify these questions for me. If he reads this. Thank you.
Funny, he quotes the Georgia Club as an example of this type of "retiree" development. Give someone at the Georgia Club a call...they are in deep, deep trouble.
All of the arguments we made against this preplanned lie are now what he is saying! BOC...you got hoodwinked BIG TIME.
We tried to tell you! You chose not to listen!
Pethel, Thomas, Bond and Youngblood - John Byram just made all four of you look like absolute fools, and, if you read the article here, he appears to be gloating about it and rubbing it in.
All I can hope is that you four gentlemen learn from this bad experience where were hoodoo-ed and don't get fooled again.
By the way, did you get the over 55 age requirement and the 2 year timetable in writing? Didn't think so. That's why we have a county attorney. In the future use his services to get these conditions in writing. Also, since the rezoning was done to help Mr. Byram with his bad finances, you could have put conditions on this rezoning so that the property could be sold, but if it was sold, the rezoning would revert back to the previous zoning classification. Did you do this? Didn't think so. In the future, don't be so naive. This man made fools out of you guys and he's laughing at you now.