No date has been set for that court battle.
But the two groups met last week, with the meeting ultimately just a formality, a chance for the BOA to appeal to the BOC to reconsider their termination.
The gathering was over in a flash, with neither side showing any sign of backing off its stance. The BOC voted unanimously to move forward with the termination of the four assessors.
The commissioners say the assessors have failed to submit tax digests by deadline, that they failed to secure a chief appraiser, that there has been constant turmoil among BOA members and that a 2008 Department of Revenue audit revealed numerous assessment problems.
Each member of the county assessor board was given 20 minutes to respond to the allegations against them Tuesday. But only two members of the group, chairman David Ragland and Larry Stewart, took the podium, addressing the board for two minutes each. The BOA’s attorney, Robert F. Leverett, Elberton, also spoke.
The attorney said that the BOC ultimately does not have the authority to remove the assessors without a judge’s ruling to back it up.
“We contend that the actual removal itself cannot occur solely by action of this board,” said Leverett. “It must be a Superior Court Judge.”
Leverett said the assessor board remains in office at least until the court hearing, and thus can’t be barred from performing its duties.
“The board members cannot be instructed not to come to those offices (the appraisal department) or to perform duties that they have,” said Leverett.
Ragland said he doesn’t believe there is compelling evidence to remove the assessors.
“This digest seems to be the hinge upon which this door is hung,” said Ragland. “We are not perfect; we are as human as you are. Our hands have been somewhat tied in the fact that the previous chief appraiser was under contract with the board of commissioners. He did not come under our management.”
Ragland said that the appraisal staff has been shorthanded and given more responsibilities by the tax commissioner’s office. He noted that the BOC cut the salary for the chief appraiser from $65,000 to $55,000 last year, then increased it to $75,000 shortly before taking the chief appraiser’s search from the BOA’s hands.
“We worked diligently to find you gentlemen, and the taxpayers, and the board of assessors, a chief appraiser,” said Ragland. “… I’d like you to know that there’s no ill will from me. I’m sorry that it has come to this.”
Stewart said he didn’t feel anything he could do or say would change the minds of the commissioners.
“We have been accused of various charges,” said Stewart. “None of them true. All we are guilty of is trying to do the best job possible and find the best people for our office and do what is right for the people of Madison County.”
Stewart said he has always “gone above the call of duty” to uphold state law as an assessor. He said he has known most of the commissioners for years.
“I find it hard to believe that you would really believe in your heart that I have done otherwise,” said Stewart. “Yet, I stand accused. Therefore, my response is simple and straightforward. I deny any and all charges against me and ask for a right…to appear before a Superior Court judge with counsel of my choosing provided by Madison County…”
After Ragland and Stewart spoke, Commissioner Bruce Scogin made the motion to move forward with the termination of the assessors.
“I’d just like to echo the sentiment of this board,” said Scogin. “I regret that it’s come to this.”
Commissioner John Pethel said he was disappointed with the assessors.
“I also would say that I’m very sorry that it has come to this and in reading this letter, that each one has prepared, I am thoroughly disappointed in some of the remarks that they made concerning the board of commissioners,” said Pethel. “When the condition in the board of assessors is what it is. I’m just terribly disappointed in the BOA that they would make that kind of comment.”
Also do BOA members get for example meal / transportation allowance's and if so how much ?
4. Other matters identified in audit of 11/3/2008
The (DOR) audit identifies a number of other grave concerns, including the BOA’s passage of a policy regarding conservation use that directly contravened state law. Specifically, those concerns are:
•A tendency to micro-manage the county appraisal staff.
•Adopting a policy on conservation use breach that is in direct conflict with state law.
•Changing residential property records to reappraise recently sold property at or near the new sales price, damaging the uniformity of assessments while distorting the sales ratio and study results.
•Allowing inconsistencies in the appraisal of commercial properties.
•Improperly using soil productivity ratings, soil classes, land desirability ratings, and land influences, and mis-reporting of acreage, all in connection with rural land.
•Improperly applying neighborhood and location factors in “incorporated” areas of the county.
These concerns identified by the DOR, like the others discussed in this notice, constitute “failure to perform the duties or requirements” of a BOA member and justify the removal under OCGA 48-5-295 (b).
This county wastes more of the taxpayers money and then cries poor mouth and want to raise taxes. Get over it! Give this money to the schools so they can provide a decent education to the children of this county.
If the energy these people spend on BS was spent on real issues, this would be a great county instead of an embarrassment.
why should you keep this going and embarrass yourselves and
the county. Be adults and move on, you are only making
yourself look bad and as the comment before mine was left,
we are laughing at you!!!
mean time, we are still laughing at all this non-sense..
what you type, oh, you are a Pethel fan, you
don't know any better!
what the field folks are doing while on county time,
taking pictures of water-falls, peoples animals etc..
just look next time you are in the court house in that
area at the pictures that have been taken with county
cameras' film and on our tax payers money! what a waste!
If these people find picture taking so amusing maybe
they should consider a new career. I am anxious to see
what happens in that dept. once they are being "directed"
does the courthouse BOA clerks not have a set time to
be at work?
They are at work and should be working not drooling over
pictures on the wall anyway! While in performance of
their duties they need to be DOING those duties not
riding the clock!
Just saying!
Check your facts, the BOA recommended Mr.Flynt for this position to the BOC. The BOC placed Mr.Flynt under a contract to work for THEM which is a conflict of interest......that is what the BOA resents.