OPINION: Teaching history of slavery is important
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
#1
Lenton Tony Ganey
on
07/22/09 at 01:42 PM
[Reply]
The whole story is that there is no right way to do wrong. It was very unfortunate that slavery ever occured and no one living now should be blamed, however the actions of those that commited the atrocity of slavery should never be defended or justified.
#2
Dan
on
07/22/09 at 03:53 PM
[Reply]
Lets not forget that it was the democrats that allowed slavery. Abe Lincoln was a Republican. Lets also look at what the democrats do today, still enslaving by means of big government handouts, by taking it from those who earned it.
#3
SardonicVeracity
on
07/23/09 at 10:18 AM
[Reply]
I have always thought that it is interesting that the cannon on that slave fort face toward the ocean rather than toward the land.
#4
Bill
on
07/23/09 at 11:56 AM
[Reply]
Well, Frank's right but wrong too. As the people he loves to hate, the history writers of the North, he too gives incomplete and slanted history. He would like you to think that the South had little or nothing to do with slavery. He seems to want people to think that the South was thinking that "Hey, it seems that the North and other African's just happened to bring some slaves to the South and it was ok because it was someone else's idea" I agree that the North had slaves and after slavery was disbanded in the North the blacks were still treated harshly. As well as were the Irish, Scots, Chinese, etc. The South, like it or not, used black people like animals for many, many years. I am sure the ship captains from the North and the African tribes just bagged and pleaded with the Southern states to take these people off of their hands. Frank is a proud southern man and that is good but turning a blind eye to the whole past (as well as the opposite that is taught in schools against the South) is incomplete, ignorant and shamelessly prideful.
#4.1
Anonymous
on
07/24/09 at 03:00 PM
[Reply]
And to have an out of date carpet bagger like you, state in a bombastic grandilouquent manner as you have here; makes your argument more plausable in what way? Just because you were taught something up north, does not mean you were taught the truth. Suppose you think that the Democrats had nothing to do with slavery either? Suppose you think states rights played no role in what happened then either. Nor did the north that you came from ever profit from that same slave labor....
#5
Bill
on
07/24/09 at 12:22 PM
[Reply]
Dan, what you are talking about are apples and oranges. The Republican and Democrat Parties have either envolved or involved over the past 150 years to differenct ideoligies. If I am not mistaken, I believe that Lincoln was the first politican to run as a member of the new Republican party. Before that I think they were called the Whigs. I realized you have hatred for the Deomcrats but it sound silly in some circumstances, like this time.
#5.1
Anonymous
on
07/27/09 at 11:05 AM
[Reply]
I agree they have changed, but the fact that the democrats wanted and supported slavery, and still enslave many under the guise of free government handouts is still slavery. Its not hatred for democrats, for I find some of those in office to be somewhat conservative. Its the liberal ones, that thinks EVERYONE should be on a level playing field, by taking from those that earned it, and giving it to those who dont. Kinda like the 40 acres and a mule at the end of the Civil War. Now I never supported slavery, but I dont like northerners spouting off the fact that their story is the only true story, HISTORY is not one sided as you seem to think it is.
#5.2
Frankg
on
07/28/09 at 11:57 AM
[Reply]
The first Republican candidate for President was John Charles Fremont, a native of Georgia
#6
Lamar
on
07/26/09 at 08:35 PM
[Reply]
The first slaves were brought to the colonies in the later part of the 1600's and early 1700's by Dutch traders to predominantly northern markets. There were no political parties then, every one was a subject of the Crown. And that is still splitting hairs. When Thomas Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence, he himself had struggled with the issue of slavery for several years. while it is true that numbers of southern planters had freed slaves well before the Civil War, a large number of these were in the years after the revolution, not so much the Antebellum era. Having said this, I am a proud southern man, with ancestors who fought for the lost cause, but any way you look at that period of american history you cannot justify the enslavement of other human beings.

