Nothing is official, but there’s been at least discussion between Madison County High School and the sheriff’s office about placing an armed officer — known as a “school resource officer” (SRO) — on campus.
“I don’t have anything definitive yet … but there have been some very serious conversations at that level about that,” Madison County Schools Superintendent Mitch McGhee said. “But for me to tell you that it’s imminent would not be true.”
This isn’t a new idea. In fact, McGhee said school leaders have discussed this for two or three years now, but funding has been an issue.
“Given the economic times we’re in, we could not do that,” McGhee said.
But Sheriff Kip Thomas said the cost of the school officer can be covered by the sheriff’s department.
“It would come out of our budget,” he said.
The officer would report directly to the principal and would be provided with an office, computer and radio by the school.
“I’m sure the principal would give him specific duties,” McGhee said. “Parking lot, during arrival and dismissal, lunch room. Your main trouble areas.”
The hope is that the officer’s hours are flexible to allow him or her to work at football games and other major after-school events.
It’s McGhee’s understanding that this officer would be armed, though that isn’t the case in all schools.
When he worked in Newton County, McGhee said one high school there had an armed officer, while the other didn’t.
“The reason he wasn’t armed was that he might be breaking up a fight, and when you’re breaking up a fight with a bunch of kids, it would be fairly easy to grab that weapon,” McGhee said.
The discussion of an SRO isn’t an indication that MCHS has discipline problems or that the officer would necessarily make the school safer.
“We had put in for grants in the past, years ago, for a school resource officer, and were told that we we’re not bad enough,” McGhee said. “We were told we did not have enough serious discipline. Which is a good thing.”
In Madison County High School’s case, McGhee said having an officer in the school is more about perception.
“We will be able to deal with some particular incidents a little quicker,” he said. “It’s a perception. And some kids may, if they see a uniformed officer walking around, they may be less likely to try something.”
Madison County Sheriff’s Department Major Shawn Burns echoed that sentiment, saying an officer present at the school will be a “proactive approach,” a way to deter problems before they happen.
“If you have an officer present, it’s less likely that the kids will try something,” said Burns.
By the way, the statement:
"The discussion of an SRO isn’t an indication that MCHS has discipline problems or that the officer would necessarily make the school safer."
would seem to suggest that an officer is not needed. If there are no discipline problems, and the officer would not make the school safer, what exactly is the point in putting an officer in the schools?
Times are tight. Budgets are tight. Our sheriff can't even manage under the budget he is running, and doesn't really show any propensity for being able to create and manage a budget other than asking for hundreds of thousands of more dollars.
Our sheriff is awfully quick to "volunteer" our tax dollars and law enforcement to provide a free officer to the schools. Maybe this demonstrates his lack of understanding of fiscal issues and fiscal responsibility?
I should mention I voted for him, but I and many other citizens are thoroughly unimpressed with his offers of free services and inability to manage a budget in this trying economic environment.
I agree with Beca. Our school does seem to have alot of disipline problems lately. I don't think it is new problems...I think it is that new administration is craking down on discipline and making it more evident. The more they crack down, the more the problems will surface, and the more then need for an officer will rise. I think the officer will be great to not only help with problems but also try to help possible problems to happen. If you aren't on the school grounds, you don't realize how much there is a need. Especially with traffic in the student parking lot.
I did not do the post you are asking about but see some merit to it. Had several people read it. They got it. NOT LEVEL playing field for students. Those often turned in have DONE NOTHING more wrong than other students have and same teacher does not turn in those students ( hint : sorty like only stopping white drivers for license checks ). Student body knows this. Disrespect for police / school system occurs. How do you trust this system but if teacher their and student can afford legal help can ask questions. I
Ask regular officers their view of some SROs. However, what interesting is hear trend after others read this of retired "on the street police officers" wanting to do this and so maybe will be better.
I support view of SROs by the way and good ones may have prevented rape problem now on the news.
If MC schools do language which required teacher or admin complaint person should attend court and not SRO representing school/teacher I think many people will support this more openly. I also disagree with later (maryann) post on MC schools as think they are excellent.
"Enter Net"? Spelled internet.
Most of those that want to call names are the same ones that white flighted from ACC. Now they want it all back. Go back and pay for your water runoff bill and tiered water bill, etc.
Let the cops hang around the Bread Basket and ogle the cashiers and customers. We really don't need this at the school.
1. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving.
2. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
3. When half the people get the idea that they don't have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
4. You can't multiply wealth by dividing it and then taxing it. It will come to point where have 12 people but only 10 gallons of water and to live each person will need 1 gallon.
.