The issues of Climategate, of widespread manipulated information, hidden data, and corrupted peer-review process transcend individual personal ambition and show how deep the corruption can go when arrogant men collude for craven purposes. Climategate is emblematic of end time verses such as the ones in 2 Timothy 3:1-4, or James 5:1-4 and thus, can be used by Christians as a marker of just where we are in the end of days. But how does this scandal affect the non-believer? How can we Christians use this information to point to God and reveal His works to a seeking heart?
God has initiated many ways to reach His lost children. One way the Lord has shown Himself in His world is through science. Romans 1:20 says: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.” Any sensitive heart that has seen a delicate flower bloom, or wondered after the mystery of a colorful sunset, the everlasting sweep of tides, or a butterfly’s wing, has pondered His invisible attributes.
Yet Satan has done a good job of separating us from God’s expression through science by deluding many into thinking that science is God. Often we see that science can be wrong. Ida was hailed as the missing link in evolutionary theory, yet it’s not even a close relative. Do we have 10 planets in our solar system? Or only 8? What killed the dinosaurs? Global warming? Or a comet?
Climategate strengthens the notion that we can, and should, question man’s conclusions, especially in the face of evidence in front of us. On the one hand, we see a “Global Warming Conference postponed due to snow” yet the scientific community’s response was “Global Warming and Cold Weather Go Hand-In-Hand.”
In many instances, science has failed, but God has never failed. If there is good to come out of Climategate, it is that questioning science is essential. In this topsy-turvy world, we have seen people question God and accept science as gospel, when it should be the other way around. “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20).
Science can often be a tool for good. Penicillin, pasteurization, and cancer treatments come to mind. Science by itself is not bad. But when scientific men seek to remove God from the equation, then anything can happen, and anything did. Science and men failed us in Climategate, but God never does. Brethren, there is the witness.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Prata
Comer
Here's a short list: Iran-Contra, the Iraq War, The Election of 2000, Abu Ghraib, Glenn Richardson, Watergate, Enron, Jack Abrahamoff, Tyco, World-Com, Bernard Kerik, Monica Goodling, Kyle Sampson, Karl Rove and the Yellowcake forgery, NSA warrantless surveillance, Duke Cunningham, Blackwater, Bush going AWOL from the Air National Guard, etc. etc. These are real scandals.
What you call climategate is a contrived scandal, meant to obfuscate the real truth about climate change. Buy into that scheme at your own peril. And pray as hard as you can.
What's the matter -- can't you express an original thought? Must you steal? What a scandal!
Climategate is huge because of the implications to millions of people as fraudulent science promotes major disruption to economies in the free world. Politicians introduce myriad fixes for a non-problem that ends up merely increasing the power and authority of government over people, jobs, and the economy at large. Tom Pain's list pales in comparison.
Not least in the dangers was the vilification of dissenters, 'deniers' in the words of the elite, as they pointed out inconsistencies in data or conclusions...to the point of compromising the peer review process. Not that peer review was faultless to begin with!!! The systematic guardianship of peer review in this climate literature meant that no significant alternative analysis or data could be published in credible scientific arenas. Thus the pro-change 'scientists' could point out the paucity of peer reviewed literature that dissented...as if that validated the pro-change position.
Neglected facts: CO2 is an essential compound, necessary for green plant growth; CO2 is just a trace part of the atmosphere; Water transformation to and from vapor along with convective transport from surface to atmosphere and return via rain is a more important aspect of climate control on earth; all of which actually transcend the impact of flawed data.
An economically chilling pronouncement, based on the highly flawed climate research, is the pronouncement that EPA can regulate CO2 causing manufacturing and power generation to install expensive CO2 abatement technologies, all of which increase production costs and final cost to consumers. With that pronouncement the people of this country have little recourse to the escalation of prices. Add to that the attendent loss of jobs as energy intensive manufacturing simply leaves the US for other less restrictive places.
It is past time for our politicians to rein in the administration attempts to transform this country from world leader to world follower.
Science theorized the Earth is round...but, uh, I guess it's flat in "ElizabethWackoLand."
Science theorized the Earth revolves around the sun, but Elizabeth says the sun moves around the Earth. She has to be right. No evidence needed in ElizabethWackoLand.
Madison County certainly has more than met its quota of ignorant hillbillies.
Nice straw man.
You seem to fit right in with the ignorant hillbillies.
The polar ice caps are melting before our very eyes, low-lying land is already being reclaimed by the rising seas, more and more species are teetering on the brink of extinction as they find themselves ill adapted to the changing environment around them. Despite a few inevitable mavericks, the consensus in the scientific community is overwhelming: anthropogenic (i.e. caused by humans) global warming - AGW - is a reality, the speed and extent of the warming eclipsing anything that has been seen before in at least the last half a million years, and correlating convincingly with the dramatic increase in the amount of carbon dioxide humans have been pumping into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution. None of the other hypothetically possible causes fits the evidence. This isn't even new science: the physics behind the heat-capturing qualities of carbon dioxide has been known about for 150 years.
So why do so many people still deny the reality of global warming? In the U.S., the loudest resistance to global warming is coming from the right-wing, and that is where the most fundamentalist religion also tends to be found. So is there something about fundamentalist Christianity that could be contributing to global warming denial? I think the answer is yes.
I am not suggesting for one moment that religious fundamentalists are the only factor: misinformation, confusion, ignorance, wishful thinking, refusal to face up to an unappealing reality, resistance to change, reluctance to make sacrifices, plus the power of vested interests will affect all sectors of society, not just the religious. There are even strands of religious teaching that see us as stewards of God's Earth, requiring us to take care of it accordingly - thus putting them nearly on the same moral level as the non-religious, who equally accept that the onus is on us to look after our planet, though without the pretense that we'll be rewarded by a higher power for doing so.
But fundamentalist Christians believe that nothing can happen if it is not God's will. Therefore, if climate change is real, it must be part of God's plan, and if it is part of God's plan, then who are we to oppose it? Those who try must by definition be working against God, and so they must be stopped. People who believe we are living in the "End Times," and who look forward to the "Rapture" at any minute, are hardly likely to see AGW as something we need to combat.
Many fundamentalist Christians also have an innate distrust of science. Science, after all, tells them that God did not create the world in six days, and that humans - far from having a special place in creation - evolved from the primeval soup, just like every other species on Earth. They therefore see science as anti-religion, and want to reject it. After all, if science contradicts the Bible, science must be wrong, right?
There is another factor too: fundamentalist religion encourages childish modes of thinking. It promises that God will keep believers safe, and that everything will work out for the best in the end, because God works all things for good. God put the rainbow in the sky to promise he would never again send a flood to cover the Earth, didn't he? So how can the sea rise so much that whole countries will be drowned? But if the scientists are right (and they are: all the evidence points to it), then we are not safe. What is more, if the scientists are right, that means we have to start taking responsibility for ourselves, and that goes against fundamentalist Christian teaching too: we are meant to be childlike, dependent on God, not relying on ourselves but trusting him to provide the solutions for us. Besides: it is not this world that matters, but the next!
Many fundamentalist Christians conveniently believe God wants them to be rich and live lives of prosperity. Many of them believe that America is God's chosen nation. That means he wants Americans to drive gas-guzzling cars and squander the world's resources. It's a sign of their faith in him, and God will reward them for that.
Finally, prayer is nothing if not wishful thinking writ large. Believers don't want AGW to be true ... therefore they will pray that it isn't ... therefore it isn't! Hallelujah! Praise the Lord!
The stark truth is that the world cannot afford these childish notions. Latest analysis suggests that we have less than ten years in which to start reversing the rise in carbon emissions if we are to avert real catastrophe. We urgently need to face this challenge as rational adults and start living up to our responsibilities to ourselves and to the rest of the world. Fundamentalist religion may not be the cause of the problem, but its infantilizing thought processes and practices may well be holding us back from dealing with it.
Times of London reports today:
"Inconvenient truth for Al Gore as his North Pole sums don't add up"
Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.
In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”
However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.
“It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”
Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.
----------------------
LOL "Ballpark". Again, the climategate thing is lies and more lies. Anyone who still believes that global warming is real is a denier of reality!
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138