Believe me there is a big difference between the two. Insurance for all of us means we will all be paying for health insurance. This does not mean we will have better health care it only means we will all have insurance and that for the insurance companies is, as the say, “Money in the bank!”
The idea that insurance will make health care better is just not true! What it will do is put your health care in the hands of an industry where profit, not your health, is the most important thing. When it comes down to your health or their profits which way do you think the decisions will go? Which way have they gone in the past? We don’t need insurance. What we need is quality health care that’s affordable and available to every one. A plan where your health, not cost, is always the first consideration and what you need to stay healthy is available to you when you need it. To accomplish this health care needs to be wrestled away from the profiteers and speculators of the for profit system we now have. The only way to make that happen is to have a government, we the people, run single payer national health care system.
There are already countries that have this type of health care system in place and it works well. In fact, the top health care systems in the world are set up this way. For those of you who believe we have the best system in the world look at this fact. According to the World Health Organization, France is first and has a national health care system in place. We are rated 37th — right behind Costa Rica and Dominica and right in front of Slovenia. That’s quite a ways from the best and leaves plenty of room for improvement.
We need to work towards a health care system that puts people in front of profit. Don’t be swayed by those crying out that it’s too expensive. We already pay the most for the health care we receive and with a 37th rating it would appear that we’re not getting what we’re paying for. National health care would not be free, but it may actually cost you less than you’re paying now. Consider the fact that almost everything you buy, your car, your home, your food, almost everything has health care costs to the company who supplies it built into the price. You are paying for that health care! Every time you make a purchase you’re paying for someone else’s health care.
With a well-designed and thought-out health care system in place, some of these hidden costs would be eliminated. Paying less for the things we buy could easily offset the cost to you for a national health care system. The key to a successful system is taking the necessary time to make it right for every one.
We should not be rushing to get something (anything) in place before the end of this year. Anything will just not work! Another year or two or three spent on working out all the details is really not that long a time to wait for a system that will provide quality health care at an affordable price for every one. Let’s slow down, stop all the yelling, and work towards a health care system that would really work. Once that’s accomplished we just might find we would all feel better.
Sincerely,
Drago Tesanovich
The bill has a lot of good stuff in it: no denial for pre-existing conditions. Heck, that alone means we should pass this bill. But it has other good provisions as well. I'm definitely interested in a federally managed insurance exchange. Get those greedy, lying insurance sales agents out of our way. And the public option in the House version of the bill is very appealing.
Wait three years? Whoa...that's just what the insurance millionaire executives want. Wait three years and see what you get. If Democrats don't maintain a Senate majority in 2010, you'll be waiting a lot longer than 3 years. Likely more than 30. You may still be waiting 100 years from now after millions of preventable deaths. Those insurance companies will still be expanding their fleets of private jets stocked with caviar, though. You have to strike while the iron is hot.
Opponents say it will cost too much. But the money is there, more than enough. The solution is quite simple. Stop spending trillions of dollars to protect the less than .001% of the population who might be killed or injured in a "terror attack" and spend those trillions to protect the 99% of all Americans who either have lack of access to affordable care, or who currently have insurance but are at risk of having their insurance unfairly and unilaterally canceled or denied resulting in eventual lack of access to care and an early, preventable death. It's simple: allocate the most resources to the biggest threat. The biggest threat against each and every American is disease and illness and lack of affordable regular health care to get check-ups and stay healthy. Terrorism isn't even on the radar. Statistically speaking, one is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be killed in a "terror attack." Think about that. We're spending trillions to protect you from an event that is less likely than you being struck by lighting! Lightning rods, anyone?
Interestingly, if someone is shot in the street or in a convenience store over $20 or a crack rock, that death is hardly noticed. If the shooter pledges allegiance to Allah before he shoots someone in the convenience store, it's a national security emergency. Have Americans only recently become this stupid, or have we been this stupid all along?
Sure, a plane was bombed here and there, but those few hundred deaths are completely overshadowed by the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, who have died in the same span due to lack of access to quality health care.
We're spending hundreds of billions to prevent a tiny percentage of deaths, and arguing over spending a few billion to prevent untold tens of thousands of deaths.
We need to channel the majority of that same money and resources to battle the real terrorists: disease and lack of access to health care.
As far as your references to "greedy, lying insurance sales agents' and “insurance millionaire executives", this suggests that you (or the author of the main article) are no fan of capitalism. Typical rhetoric of the left. Capitalism has brought more people out of poverty that any other economic system that our world has every seen. Great minds discovered that paying people for performance, production and hard work (both MENTALLY and physically) were the keys to TRUE progress and not some silly "collective" government run fiasco. Do you actually think that socialism or communism would have created the scientists and engineers who designed this great medical technology that we see at our hospitals in this great nation? I do not think so. Only capitalism can achieve this. Capitalism is not perfect but it is the best "public" option available.
Last but not least, it's obvious that you do not know the definition of terrorists. By definition, a terrorist is a radical who employs terror as a political weapon. Conventional wisdom tells me and anyone else with common sense that "disease" and 'lack of access to health care" does not fall into this definition.
Our government has never ran anything efficiently and you’re ready to allow them to dictate your health and well being?? Simply unbelievable.
In conclusion you now have three items discussed here to research. Understand contracts, understand the benefits of capitalism and look up the definition of "terrorism". Upon completion of these three tasks, maybe, just maybe you can realize that the free market and liberty are not he enemies but the answer.