Congressman John Linder’s recent announcement that he plans to retire after this term brought out a series of comments about his pet project, the so-called Fair Tax.
During my time as editor and publisher of the Journal, Madison County was in his district. On several occasions, he visited the Journal office in Danielsville and engaged us in conversations about his opinions and ideas. Even then, he was interested in the fair tax proposal.
The Fair Tax would have eliminated all payroll, capital gains and estate taxes in favor of a national sales tax. It would also have eliminated, or greatly reduced, the Internal Revenue Service. While the tax would have caused a considerable increase in the price of goods, it would have also increased the take home pay of workers and simplified life for buyers and sellers throughout the nation.
One of the complaints about the plan is that the tax would have to be very high to cover the cost of government, and that is correct. Another argument was that the tax would be figured into the price of goods, and people would not know how much tax they were paying. Nothing on their payroll slip would reveal the tax burden to them, and that is also correct.
But there are some clear advantages to the idea. For example, if you purchase American made goods, a major part of the price is created by payroll taxes on each person involved from the miners who dug the ore, to the foundry workers, to the factories that made the stuff, to the truck drivers who delivered it and finally the clerks who sold it to you. Whereas, imported goods only paid taxes for the last two people. Imported goods pay far fewer taxes than do domestic ones.
The Fair Tax would collect an equal amount of taxes on all goods, domestic or imported. That would reduce the advantage of imports and give American-made goods an even break. By keeping more manufacturing jobs in America, our unemployment figures would improve dramatically. People would have more money to spend generating revenue to support the government. Fewer people would be on welfare reducing the cost of government.
By cutting out the amount of record keeping, more people would be able to open and operate family businesses. Couple that with a dramatic reduction in rules and regulations and we could dramatically reduce the impact of government on them and giving them more control over their own lives.
To me, the Fair Tax idea has merit and ought to be given full consideration. It may be a good idea, or it may not work. But until Congress gives it a fair hearing, we will never know.
Frank Gillispie is founder of The Madison County Journal. His e-mail address is frank@frankgillispie.com. His website can be accessed at http://www.frankgillispie.com/gillispieonline.
Rich people that don't pay taxes now will not tolerate a FaiTax system,and they're the ones that contribute to political campaigns,not the average Joe.
Linder just gave the idea lip service to make himself appear to actually care about the common person.
Plus, there's no way politicians want us to know the actual percentage of taxes we pay per dollar earned.
It's probably around 60 percent.
Bring on the Fair Tax! NO ONE claims it is THE Fair Tax; we only claim it is MORE FAIR than the crazy property tax crap game we're all getting conned with now!
So, if you consider the average family makes about $40k these days, if they spent ALL of that money and didn't use any of it to save/invest/use on education, they would pay taxes on about $10,900 in spending. 23% of that is $2507. Taken as a percentage of total income ($40k), that represents a 6.3% tax rate.
Put that up against what the same family pays today - social security and medicare taxes alone come out to 7.65% of their total income - NONE of it is exempt - plus such families have to have money withheld every paycheck, making it hard to get ahead. When the embedded costs of taxes that are in products we buy are factored in, you can add another 22% on top of the SS/MC taxes - remember, this family is spending all $40k. If they are in the 10% tax bracket - well, it depends on deductions, but this family is paying at least $12,000 a year in taxes, for an overall tax rate of at least 30%.
There is much more to the FairTax to this, and as a person making $36k a year, I, my wife and two kids fully support it, because it would bring jobs back to the US, kick-start the economy, plus help people like me, who can better decide how to spend my money than the government can, to get ahead.
-Kilborn