You, Mr. Bridges, are a supervisor of a hometown newspaper. Your attempting to clarify what you feel is confusion about real journalism by printing a biased, opinionated rant is more “warped” than those millions who prefer Fox News to CNN, MSNBC, CBS or PBS.
I don’t get all my news from Fox or any one source. No doubt, millions of other people can truthfully say the same thing.
I agree with you that people need to “check facts.” That’s good common sense, a rare thing in society now. Unfortunately, we have a world filled with people who are skilled at using gadgets, but they have never learned to use their own brain for much benefit. Checking facts is more work than they are accustomed to. They easily fall into the trap of believing lies if they are presented to them in desirable packaging and especially if their peers are buying it.
I personally couldn’t care less where you get your “cheap thrills.” Being a straight lady, I don’t watch Fox News to be “thrilled” by those anchor ladies. But I certainly do prefer their views to those old bats on “The View.” Your demeaning statement about the Fox anchor ladies’ mode of dress is untrue. Those ladies dress in good taste and would be considered well dressed in any reputable environment. They are articulate, intelligent, attractive and well educated, as well as a couple who are published authors of best-selling books.
The people who you said “aren’t real journalists,” Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck, to name two, are published authors of multiple books that sell millions of copies worldwide. All of these people who you call “yackers” publish news daily. That is journalism.
You claim that CNN and you aren’t leaning left or right to any extreme. That claim isn’t real. You are transparent and CNN is leaning so far left that they are nearly on the ground. Reference their ratings to show that people do know this from viewing.
I do partially agree with your statement that “given the state of today’s choices give me yesterday.” I wouldn’t say “everytime” as you did.
The world is full of choices. If I could give young people any advice now it would be to daily make good choices. It takes using your own mind and some actual work to do that. I miss the newspapers of yesterday. I miss Mr. Jere Ayers’ “Monitor” and “The Comer News.” I miss the gold ole’ days not so long ago when Frank Gillispie did “The Madison County Journal,” before he sold it. I miss being able to buy the Atlanta Journal and Constitution all over Georgia before having to turn on a computer and read and electronic version of what used to be real journalism.
Sincerely,
Joanne P. White
Danielsville
Try 'you're'. (you are)
Bored and nit-picking
Glad I can help.
Merriam/Webster Main Entry: your
Pronunciation: \yər, ˈyu̇r, ˈyȯr\
Function: adjective
1 : of or relating to you or yourself or yourselves especially as possessor or possessors , agent or agents , or object or objects of an action
2 : of or relating to one or oneself
3 —used with little or no meaning almost as an equivalent to the definite article the
If your is the correct usage as you seem to believe, then the sentence would read as follows:
Your attempting IS to clarify what you feel is confusion.
Otherwise, she should have used You're. The contraction of You are.
In simpler terms, your is always an adjective. An adjective always modifies a noun. In order for your to be correct then attempting would have to be a noun. You think attempting is a noun?
n00b pwnd
WTG on the pwnage, regardless. It's fun to pick at the people who seem to have English as a second language!
YOUR ATTEMPTING TO CLARIFY/IS/LAUGHABLE
In this case, 'attempting' is part of a noun phrase, used the same way here as it was in Joanne's sentence.
You're attempting to clarify what you feel is confusion about the use of the words your and you're, is laughable.
YOU'RE (YOU ARE) ATTEMPTING TO CLARIFY/IS/LAUGHABLE.
This is an incorrect use of the contraction for you are, the correct word being YOUR.
The verb in both sentences (mine and Joanne's) is "IS". A well-placed comma or two would have improved her sentence, but her use of 'your' is correct. And since you asked, I did graduate from high school, with honors, and am also quite proficient in the use of the words to, too and two, as well as there, their and they're.
Stanford has a simple, online sentence parsing website. Why don't you give it a whirl?
http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp
[quote] God help us all if your a high school graduate. [end quote]
pah-pow
Actually, several people noticed, and had a good laugh, at your expense. I decided you probably did it on purpose, just to get me to point it out, so you could make some smart-alecky remark about how since I only thought "your" was correct, you would use it from now on, right or wrong. If that was your evil plan, I was more than happy to do my part to thwart it, by not pointing it out. If it was just a dumb mistake, all the better. When it finally showed up on the boards, and you read your post, how stupid you must have felt.
Ba Dum Bum
To Sardonic, Anonymous, and While:
YOUR (adjective) attempting (gerund = verb used as a noun) to correct someone else's grammar IS (verb) noble, but YOU'RE (contraction of you are) wrong in this case.
Either way, my hunch is that the original author of the clunky sentence did not intend the usage in the way you defend.
The only reason I posted in the first place is that I really enjoyed, and agreed with, Joanne's letter. I am a FOX news watcher, absolutely abhor "The View", and lean so far to the right, it's a wonder I don't fall over (more often). It ticked me off to the Nth degree for someone to come along and smugly pick apart her post, for no other reason than boredom. And to be wrong, wrong, wrong on top of that.
I am disappointed to see you imply that JournalismGrad would "lean toward a more readable version" or that "the original author of the clunky sentence did not intend the usage in the way you defend". JournalismGrad may very well lean that way, but that’s not the point. The correct word is 'your', and I suspect you know it. It seems out of character for you to make such lame excuses. I hope you're just having a bad day.
Although I do think that the sentence would work better if it had been written with attempt instead of attempting, I hate to realize that, in my haste, I have made an error! I am a lot more Social Science that I am Language Arts - I should stick to what I know!
Everybody's lame sometimes.
:)
I just hate seeing SV dragged thru the mud like this,even if he is a glutten for punishment.
Now,can't we get back on subject and drag Bridges instead? It's his well-deserved party.
ps. Which one of you is Zach?