Finally, someone is getting around to addressing the problem of persistent poverty. Persistent poverty is described as a family that has remained on the poverty rolls for three or more census periods (30 years). Some researchers have discovered that some families are now in the third generation of welfare recipients. Some groups, like One Athens in Clarke County are developing new plans to attack the problem.
Now, the first step in problem solving is to define the problem, specifically the source of the problem. And none of the new plans that I have seen so far do a very good job of that. So let me attempt to define the problem of persistent poverty.
The former Confederate states are by far the most poverty stricken areas in the U.S.A. Their poverty was originally induced by the 10 years following that disaster, the period of the so-called Reconstruction.
The occupied states were stripped of all resources by “carpetbaggers” and corrupt union administrators. Then the radical Republicans of the Northeastern states used their political power to impose their socialist ideas on the region.
They started with a massive federal program intended to assist newly free slaves called the Freedmen’s Bureau. When this program only enlarged the problems they began developing more and more direct federal interference with the emerging economy. Each program locked more and more people into dependent relationship with the government bureaucracy. Soon, for many Americans, dependency on government to supply their daily needs became a way of life.
I come from a very large Southern family. My grandfather was adamantly opposed to welfare. He considered the inability of any man to care for his own family to be a source of great shame. But his attitude was not held by many other Southerners.
As a child, I saw many of my relatives struggle against poverty with hard work and careful use of what resources they had. I saw others who signed up for government welfare programs. Today, those families that rejected welfare and insisted on living on their own resources, as limited as they were, are doing well. Most of them now live comfortable, independent lives. But those who signed up for the government welfare programs are still on welfare, along with their children and grandchildren.
Welfare is an addiction, no different from those who become dependent on drugs, alcohol, gambling or other controlling factors. And just in the case of other addictions, welfare addicts are supported in their addiction by enablers. In this case, the enablers are the government welfare bureaucrats who so easily hand out taxpayers money without insisting on the recipients giving anything back in return. Why should anyone work for a living when government gives them everything they need?
The only way to end poverty in the South is to require the welfare class to become self sufficient. That means getting them totally off government hand outs, including food stamps and housing support and all other forms of welfare. Only when people learn to care for themselves will they ever escape the addiction to poverty.
The answer is simple. Our welfare class was taught to depend on government. Now they must be taught to be self sufficient. Every welfare office should have an intense program of education that includes, work skills, household economics, proper child care, and self help motivation. If necessary, a new public works program similar to the old CCC and WPA programs could be developed to guide them into working to support themselves and their families.
Only when we can wean the welfare class off of government dependence and back into the workforce will we have a chance to end poverty in America.
Frank Gillispie is founder of The Madison County Journal. His e-mail address is frankgillispie671@msn.com. His website can be accessed at http://frankgillispie.tripod.com/
I enjoyed reading your article entitled “Welfare Class Needs to Learn Self Reliance.” I am in the tenth grade, and I am learning about American government and how it works. Your article reminds me of a saying I once heard. “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime” However, the government seems to think that the saying is, “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you will not have to listen to his incessant whining about how hungry he is.” It was interesting to read how the welfare system got started and how while it claims to help people, long term, welfare recipients can’t seem to pull themselves out of the poverty they are in, while lacking the skills they need to improve their lives. Many of the people who receive welfare think of it as a right. They feel that it is something that the government owes them. Some people have even lived in government housing for three generations! Welfare should be a temporary solution. Once these impoverished people are trained by the government in a skill that can increase their earning potential, they should be removed from the welfare system and be required to support themselves and their family. I think that the government housing and welfare system should have a limit of six months. Three months of support should be given while being trained for their new career, and then three more months while working at that career which will give them a chance to save money for their new living arrangements. By teaching welfare recipients a new skill, they will feel better about themselves and will improve their lifestyle on their own if they realize that there is nothing to fall back on. The new saying for self reliance would then be, “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime. Teach a man to sell fish and he eats steak.”
Sincerely,
Jake Salts
Not all people on welfare are lazy, there are those that have just had a bad run of luck, or just don't have the skills and can't afford to get a higher education to seek a better, higher paying job. As a result, these people are living pay check to pay check praying that they will be able to feed their kids that month or pay the bills to keep some heat.
There are very few ignorant people I've heard say that they are proud to be on welfare. To many, they feel that they are a failure and an embarrassment; they couldn't be the "bread winner" for their family to count on. When I was a kid my family had to get food stamps and in no way was I happy about it.
While I've been in college, I had to apply for food stamps and welfare due to the fact that while I was working two jobs and going to school full time, I couldn't make ends meet. Again, it wasn't something I boasted about. In fact, I ended up not finishing my application to submit because I felt so worthless.
The welfare system is not like striking the lottery there are strict guidelines on the time allowed to find a job and maintain that job. If they do not have one within, I believe a six month time frame, they are kicked off welfare. If at any time and any reason they are terminated from the job, they are stripped of welfare benefits. In this economy where we've almost hit a depression again, some people would die without welfare.
It has become easy for those who have a higher class status, or who have not been on welfare to make assumptions that all those who are on welfare are lazy and just feeding off the government creating more problems for the economy. That's not an accurate stereotype, in fact little of our taxes are put towards welfare programs.
While I may just be a student in college and haven't learned everything yet, I've studied quite a bit about welfare and with what I've learned about it has made me realize how unfair these stereotypes are about those stricken by poverty.