If you’re an elected official and are truly serving citizens, then you shouldn’t leverage your power to get a leg up financially.
An umpire who uses his game-time authority to get rich is corrupt. A journalist who is bribed into editorial decisions is morally bankrupt. A judge who issues decisions based on cash handshakes is a crook in his own court. These three examples would all be embarrassments to their professions.
Yet, in our nation, a Congressman who takes money or gifts from those seeking to influence his decisions on the laws of the land is just conducting business as usual. He’s even boastful about his integrity as he takes contributions from those who seek to secure his vote on legislation. He’s just acting like all his fellow legislators. That’s true. He can take comfort in the “everybody’s doing it” excuse. But it’s still corrupt, even if it’s widescale.
This setup is, in fact, a national sin. And, to some extent, we are all culpable. As a nation we have not demanded more of our politicians and of our political structure. We are too ready to say, ‘Oh, that’s just the way it is. Washington will never change.” Then we get fired up about one party or another and act as if the see-saw isn’t broken in the middle.
In his book, “Throw them all out,” outspoken conservative Peter Schweizer took aim at Republicans and Democrats in Congress who have used their position to make millions.
Schweizer notes that while the average American household has lost up to 20 percent of its net worth since 2008, members of Congress have increased their net worth by 25 percent in the same time period. These elected officials are privy to valuable information. And a number of them use that inside information on the Stock Market. Seems criminal, for sure, but that insider trading is just an institutional perk of the job in Congress, along with the nice pensions and health care plans. And who’s going to make laws against such action, Congress?
Naturally, that title — “Throw them all out” — leads to the follow up question: And replace them with what?
Time after time, we see the public respond to ineffectual leadership with the “throw-them-all-out” attitude at the polls. Then the new bunch becomes the same old bunch and we repeat the cycle over and over.
It’s easy to get mad at the individuals. Say the names Nancy Pelosi or John Boehner and see how a Republican or Democrat will respond.
But the ouster of individual politicians doesn’t alter the fundamental problem. We have a political pay-for-play system that undermines the entire legislative process.
For instance, the laws set after the Great Depression to protect the nation from the worst kinds of speculative trading were stripped away in the late 90s by Congress, which received big money from big banks, who said they were smart enough to gamble with big risks. Those politicians liked getting the cash from Wall Street and dropped the old rules that limited risky betting. Those banks then failed spectacularly and brought down the entire economy. Congressmen then bailed out their contributors in spectacular fashion. The $700 billion bailout is actually not what the federal government spent on the rescue plan. According to a current report in The Atlantic news magazine, “Add up guarantees and lending limits, and the Fed had committed $7.77 trillion as of March 2009 to rescuing the financial system,” the Atlantic stated.
Wow, a nearly $8 trillion bailout!
This is a direct result of Congress taking the money and giving Wall Street what it wanted. They were bought off. And this self interest is ultimately at the heart of our financial collapse. When Wall Street got drunk on mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps, gambling away all that money, Congress jumped in with $8 trillion for those who squandered everything. Amazing! Congress enabled the casino years of high risk gambling on Wall Street, then paid nearly $8 trillion to cover the gambling debts, leaving millions in dire straits afterwards. People who have suffered are certainly angry, often swinging wildly in one direction or another, but many have no concept of this enormous swindle. They still put hope that this politician or party will alter the way business is done. Sadly, that just won’t happen, not without a deeper change to the system.
That means people of the left and right, people with the Tea Party and with Occupy Wall Street, people young and old — all of these people need a cohesive message.
“Hey, Congress shouldn’t be about self service. It’s about public service.”
A judge would never get a pass for taking a bribe in exchange for a decision. A Congressman shouldn’t either. The political system must be altered to vilify what is truly villainous — not reward it. We must call for campaign finance reform, term limits, cutbacks in Congressional perks and the criminalization and prosecution of insider trading by members of Congress who enjoy the advantage of “in-the-know” committee seats.
If this country can’t put aside our partisan hatreds and join together to push for such needed action, then we are also to blame for our political failings.
Zach Mitcham is editor of The Madison County Journal.
Call who? Our Congressmen and Senators? A freakin' Lawyer? The Media?
Term limits and campaign finance reform is the only answer. Eight years is long enough to entrust any of them with control of our lives.
Campaign finance reform? If a person has enough money to get elected these days, that's reason enough right there to know that you can't trust them.
Zack good writting.
Oh, my! You need to revisit the history of the Women's Suffragette movement in this country. Women had to fight against men for many decades to get the vote. Men did NOT encourage women to vote! Black men were able to vote before women. Given attitudes back then against blacks, that means women were third class citizens or worse.
Good to have your comments here. Please take my advice though; don't expect much and you won't be disappointed.
As to your grandmother, I would bet that she did her exhausting share of manipulating her husband around to her desires. She most likely got him to do the right thing by appealing to his selfishness. "Just think, Mr. Husband, I could double your voting power by being allowed to vote in the same fashion as you do." Then she cast her secret (thank goodness) ballot how she wanted, telling him she voted as he did. The things women have had to do to get the world right since the beginning of time is the only reason why the human species is still here.
The reason why men did not believe that women should vote is simple ms. K. Women are overwhelmingly for nearly everything that men are against. It was a matter of fear.
Black vote only counted as a portion of a full vote and considering there was little of that vote, it was no real threat.
As of today, the occupy movement has caused people who work to loose their ability to get to those jobs. People claiming to be trying to make things better for some have created more hardship and the overwhelming cost of this mess has used up 15 million dollars of New York's money that was ear marked for school buses to be used to take children to school. Now those children will have to use public transit. That might not seem like such a bad thing to some . But to those who have been forced to use public transit in New York, it is a very bad thing. All thanks to "occupy". Oh, and many of those in that movement have been offered jobs lately but refused to leave their streets and that so called movement for a job that" might not be fulfilling to them."
This article is good Zack. You are thinking on track. May be since Congress only works 6 months out of the year any way, they should have to actually get paid for only 6 months instead of a full year. Think of those savings.
"The reason why men did not believe that women should vote is simple ms. K. Women are overwhelmingly for nearly everything that men are against. It was a matter of fear."
Again, I would like more supportive information on this broadbrush statement as well. I would not say "overwhelmingly" but nature sure has made men and women oppositional in many ways. Are you saying that men were afraid of women? If so, why? They frequently use those ridiculous excuses that women are unintelligent, over-emotional, scatter-brained and such. But the truth is that women have superior brains, instinctively know what is right and attempt to make men do what is right. Of course men would not like to be made to do what is right if they didn't want to.
As all non-governmental organizations and charities doing work all over the world now know, the only way to effect positive change anywhere is to first empower women (translation: get men out of the way); they will then do the rest themselves. Over the past 10, even 20, years where this has been implemented, real progress has been made. Example: Years ago micro loans were tried in Africa to help jumpstart prosperity. Of course, these loans were made to men, the responsible ones (can't give money to scatter-brained women, you know). The default rate over several years was 87%; no sense in throwing good money after bad. They reluctantly tried giving the loans directly to women instead. The default rate over several years was an unheard of anywhere in the world 2% (yes, two percent!) and their businesses thrived and continue to thrive and grow. Now the women have power since they are able to sustain themselves and even their children on their own which means they are no longer slaves to their men (and, in fact, may not even need them).
Please go to www.girleffect.org to fully understand this phenomenon.
We dont need to calm down at all! If anything we need to find new and creative ways to hold this out of control, corrupt government, accountable ! Period !
Read the Declaration Of Independence.
Then ask yourself is it time again ?
Those in this country who dont see the problem ,ignore it and dont want to fix it because they profit the most from it just the way it is.
FYI I baked 36 organic oatmeal cookies this morning and am sitting here reading and picking through 20 pounds of cracked pecans (8 worms so far). This is why your post caught my eye. Weird.