Watson Mill will remain a state park and clerks will remain at the park to handle reservations — provided Madison County provides about $26,000 a year for park maintenance.
State officials, who downgraded the park and laid off the staff this past fall, expect a $26,760 per year commitment from the county for Watson Mill. The Department of Natural Resources proposed a five-year agreement with the county for the park maintenance. If the county provides that funding, the state will continue to oversee Watson Mill as a “state park.”
County commissioners agreed to the deal recently on the condition that the county has the annual option of backing out of the arrangement.
Madison County will now seek a “non-renewal” clause in the contract, which must be amended, reviewed by the state once again and sent back to the commissioners.
Madison County leaders have spent several months negotiating with the DNR on maintaining Watson Mill.
In late 2011, the state announced that it was downgrading the state park to an “outdoor recreation area.” But county commissioners have fought that move, saying that the downgrade will hurt the local economy by significantly reducing the number of visitors to the park, who buy gas, groceries and other products in the county. Commissioners also say that the downgrade could transform the park from a recreation spot to a hub of criminal activity.
Please, SardonicVeracity and anyone else, when you post your opinion here, say why you think your opinion is valid. Without support, your opinion means nothing, in fact, less than nothing because you appear to be not very bright.
We do not take in enough taxes to cover our debts as it is. That's even before Watson Mill is re-classified meaning it will surely contribute less than it does now.
$30,000+ for ariel pictures, $26,000 for this park, the list goes on. We keep adding debt to a budget that is already projected to be in the red. Is that really okay?
Oh, and please don't run SV away, he's very bright, and a worthy adversary. He'll probably be back to prove my point shortly.
"If" the last paragraph is true and the park is so vital to the county's economy and not just the county's commissioners posturing in an attempt to retain an accustomed slice of the financial tax-pie, then, you can NOT afford to NOT do this.
The reason that ai did not elaborate further on my opinion, is... I thought it was obvious that I was rebutting the first poster.
For future reference, my opinion is valid because I am awesome. If I were working on a research project here, I would footnote.
My opinion always means something ...with or without supporting statements....who are you?
I'm sorry that I confused you with the double negative.
While it did not confuse me, I did fail to take note of your double negative. Worse, I suspect it was out of assumption, which is embarassing. Please accept my aplogies for expecting your post to fall in line with others here that caused my assumption. I don't usually pay attention to who is posting, but perhaps I should in order to weed out the useless contributions. I will look forward to your thoughtful and reasoned contributions in the future.
Let the merchants that benefit from it,pay for it.
Does the county police patrol in this area? I seem to recall them making arrest there recently. I feel safe.
Special Interest = alive and well.
Commissioners = Republicrats. All of them.