Do you remember in school studying the reasons for the American Revolution. The slogan “No Taxation without Representation” was the rallying cry for the rebels. They objected strongly to the British king collecting taxes in the colonies when they had no representation in the British parliament.
Well, it appears to me that it is time to drag that slogan out of history and reintroduce it as part of our new tax debate. According to the recent ruling by our Supreme Court that the Obama Health Care plan to penalize people for not buying insurance is a tax. In fact, many political pundits insist that the entire bill contains dozens of new taxes that were hidden in those thousands of pages of text that makes up the bill. None of which were made clear to Congress before the bill was passed.
Remember what then Speaker of the House Pelosi said, “We have to pass the bill before we can see what is in it!”
Pelosi, the Democratic leadership and the White House still insist that the many revenue enhancing measures in the bill are not taxes. But Chief Justice Roberts says that unless the measures are a tax, that the bill cannot stand. According to his, and the left wing of the courts, ruling, the bill must be interpreted on the basis of the tax laws and not the commerce clause. They argued that the commerce clause cannot be used to force individual economic actions on individuals.
Then there is the question of the bill’s position on Medicaid. It contains a section requiring the states to drastically expand their Medicaid programs. If they refuse, then the federal government could cut off all financial contributions to the state programs. This portion of the bill was ruled unconstitutional. That lends support to the tenth amendment’s states rights position.
So, the White House is still trying to say that the demands placed on individuals by the health care bill are not taxes, and thus are constitutional. The Supreme Court, the Tea Party and many conservative commentators insist that it is.
It is clear to me that it is a tax that was hidden from congress by the massive bill, and that most of our legislatures voted for the bill without having any idea of the taxes it contained. Therefore, it was a case of “taxation without representation,” and thus abuses our citizens and our economy with an unfair tax.
Take care, America. We may well be facing our third great tax war. The first was the American Revolution. The second was the war for Southern Independence (yes, that war was about taxes far more than the question of slavery,) and now a war to end the abusive taxes currently being imposed by our federal government.
This new war is being fought at the ballot box, and this November will determine the winner. I am voting for the taxpayers to win over big government. You have to decide how you will vote.
Frank Gillispie is founder of The Madison County Journal. His e-mail address is frank@frankgillispie.com. His website can be accessed at http://www.frankgillispie.com/gillispieonline.
I say we should take his advice and overthrow the government. I'm sure once his checks and benefits stop his family will be more than happy to take care of him.
Just like the Good ol' days.
Vive la Revolution!
For the record Frank, this was well thought out and not a bad read.
As I've suggested before, ObamaCare is trying to solve a massive, highly complex problem with America's health care. To please the right, it has attempted to do this using the free-market system that is in place so as to not disrupt the insurance industry. The mandate came out of this consideration for conservatives. No one likes the mandate on its fundatmentals, but no one likes new taxes, either. So how does the problem get solved when everyone is saying "NO"? The point is that when all citizens participate in health care insurance, each citizen's cost goes down; there is no argument about that (I won't try to explain that again here). I will assume that, as a moral society, we agree that all citizens should have access to adequate and affordable health care. Now, given all that, what? Call it what you want, I am in favor of everybody participating who can truly afford it. The rest are covered by all of us together, rather than just those who are sick or injured in their inflated charges from providers.
We had representation, technically, but we were poorly represented as we have been for thirty years now. Perhaps our system no longer works for the people and needs completely revamping to give the citizens more power and control. In the case of ObamaCare, I think our representatives voted for it because something needed to be done and the bill allowed for future modeling and new ideas within it. Something is better than nothing!
I am happy to pay Medicare and Social Security "taxes"/"contributions" (mandate) because I believe it is society's obligation to take care of its aging population and it has always made me feel more secure about my future old age. Having suffered the economic losses I have had with this recession and the mild one earlier, I have no time to recover and have started drawing SS earlier than I intended because I am not eligible for unemployment compensation being self-employed. Just the safety net I needed, just in time, but the lower payments for the rest of my life will hurt me the same as the significant losses to my lean retirement portfolio and house value that I was dependent on will. All this has happened because of poor and corrupt representation, not lack of representation.